Member Login
Lost your password?

Statement on the Arbitrary Arrest and Detention of Mr Charoenchai Sae-tang

07/07/2017
By

On 1 July 2017, military personnel and ununiformed authorities have invoked power under Article 44 of the interim Constitution to arbitrarily arrest Mr Charoenchai Sae-tang, an activist who campaigned to have Article 112 of the Thai Criminal Code (lèse-majesté) revoked, and confiscate his communication devices. Charoenchai was unlawfully arrested at his residence in Bangkok, and taken into military custody at the 11th Army Circle barrack in Bangkok, with no access to family members and legal counsel. On the same day, Charoenchai’s relatives had gone to Bukkhalo police station in Bangkok to look for him and were informed by the police that a summons record had been issued with grounds for detention. The police stated that there were reasonable grounds to believe that Charoenchai was inclined to violate Article 112 of the Criminal Code, even though he was not yet charged. The relatives had twice requested access to Charoenchai at the 11th Army Circle barrack, but were refused without any clarification of the power, grounds and period of the detention.

Thai Lawyers for Human Rights is of the opinion that the trend of arbitrary arrest and detention has continuously occurred since the 2014 coup. Authorities have invoked power under Article 44 of the interim Constitution, whose legality has been confirmed by the Court of Justice, to enforce Head of the NCPO Order nos. 3/B.E. 2558 (2015) and 13/B.E.2559 (2016) to detain individuals up to seven days without charges or having to bring them before a competent, independent and impartial tribunal. Such practice has set a precedent for measures to deprive detainees of their rights and liberties without any judicial review. Evidence obtained during illegal detention has been included in the investigation files in cases where detainees are prosecuted following the detention. Such practice is incompliant with the rights to a fair trial and fair criminal procedure.

Thai Lawyers for Human Rights deems the authorities’ practice an arbitrary arrest and detention with claim of the coup as a legal basis. Detainees who are held incommunicado without access to lawyers and family members are directly subjected to torture and ill-treatment. Thai Lawyers for Human Rights emphasises that the authorities’ practice has contributed to the enforced disappearance, a gross violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The invocation of Article 44 of the interim Constitution and the enforcement of Head of the NCPO Orders nos. 3/B.E.2558 (2015) and 13/B.E.2559 (2016) constitute Thailand’s negligence to its international human rights obligations as a ratifying Member State to the ICCPR since 1996. The Thai Government has allowed the omission or ambiguity in Thai legislations to government authorities to arbitrarily arrest and detain individuals without justification for detention, judicial review or remedies and reparation for the victims.

Such exercise of power by the government authorities should not be deemed as a “common” practice in society. To prevent state crime and to protect the rights and liberties of the people, Thai Lawyers for Human Rights demand the Thai Government to act as follows;

  1. Military personnel must immediately release Mr Charoenchai Sae-tang. Authorities involved in the arbitrary arrest and detention must clarify the power exercised and the course of justification for such detention. The military personnel must take responsibility for any damages that have occurred to Charoenchai’s rights and libertires, as well as provide him with effective remedies and reparation.
  2. Authorities must cease the exercise of arbitrary power, arrest and detention, despite invoking power under Article 44 of the interim Constitution to enforce Head of the NCPO Order nos. 3/B.E.2558 (2015) or 13/B.E.2559 (2016).
  3. Revoke Article 44 of the interim Constitution B.E. 2557 (2014) and all orders issued under its power, including Head of the NCPO Order nos. 3/B.E.2558 (2015) and 13/B.E.2559 (2016).

With respect for the rights and liberties of the people

Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,



Top Posts

TAG

112 116 BBC Thai freedom of expression Head of NCPO order 3/58 military court NDM กฎอัยการศึก กรุงเทพ ขบวนการประชาธิปไตยใหม่ ขอนแก่น ข้อหาชุมนุมทางการเมือง ควบคุมตัวมิชอบ คำสั่งหัวหน้า คสช. ที่ 3/2558 จตุภัทร์ บุญภัทรรักษา จ่านิว บีบีซีไทย ประชามติ ประชามติร่างรัฐธรรมนูญ พ.ร.บ.คอมพิวเตอร์ พ.ร.บ.ชุมนุมสาธารณะ พ.ร.บ.ประชามติ พฤติการณ์คุกคาม พูดเพื่อเสรีภาพ ม.112 มทบ.11 มาตรา 44 มาตรา 112 ศาลจังหวัดขอนแก่น ศาลทหาร ศาลทหารกรุงเทพ ศิริกาญจน์ เจริญศิริ ศูนย์ทนายความเพื่อสิทธิมนุษยชน ศูนย์ปราบโกงประชามติ สภ.เมืองขอนแก่น สิทธิในกระบวนการยุติธรรม หมิ่นประมาทพระมหากษัตริย์ เฟซบุ๊ค เรียกรายงานตัว เสรีภาพการชุมนุม เสรีภาพการแสดงออก เสรีภาพในการแสดงออก แชร์เฟซบุ๊ก ไผ่ จตุภัทร์ ไผ่ ดาวดิน